U.S. Supreme Court Refuses to Hear Challenge to FATCA

  • The U.S. Supreme Court has declined to hear an appeal from
    the U.S. Court of Appeals’ ruling in the Crawford case, in which the
    constitutionality of FATCA was unsuccessfully argued.
  • While the Republican Party has previously shown some
    sympathy for efforts to repeal or scale back FATCA, under the Trump
    Administration the law continues to impose significant reporting burdens on
    U.S. taxpayers residing abroad.


The Court’s Ruling

On April 2, 2018, the United States Supreme Court denied the
petitioners’ request for a Writ of Certiorari to review the ruling of the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in Crawford v. United States
Department of the Treasury, 868 F.3d 438 (6th Cir. 2017).The core issue in this
petition was whether the Sixth Circuit erred by holding that Petitioners lacked
standing in challenging the constitutionality of the Foreign Account Tax
Compliance Act (FATCA).

By declining to hear this matter, the U.S. Supreme Court
effectively validated the district court’s earlier ruling (discussed here) that
denied the plaintiffs’ claims. As is customary with respect to petitions for
certiorari, the Court did not provide reasons for its decision.


Political and Legislative Background

A push to repeal or significantly scale back the reporting
burdens imposed on U.S. taxpayers residing abroad had been included in the
Republican Party election platform in 2016 (see page 12, under “The Fourth
Amendment”). Moreover, Senator Rand Paul (R-KY), who was also part of this
unsuccessful lawsuit, tried to include FATCA repeal in tax reform legislation
last year. However, these legislative efforts also failed and the tax bill
signed into law on December 22, 2017 and known as the Tax Cuts and Jobs
Act was enacted without changes to FATCA


Source: https://www.stikeman.com/en-ca/kh/canadian-securities-law


Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on pinterest
Share on linkedin

Leave a Reply

Subscribe To Our Weekly Newsletter

No spam, notifications only about new products, updates.

Related Posts

Economic Substance in the Turks & Caicos Islands

We have written about Economic Substance (ES) in many jurisdictions – https://www.mooresrowland.tax/?s=economic+substance Today we explore the Turks and Caicos Islands OVERVIEW         In response to the

The Truth About Estonian companies

We have podcast interviews with thought leaders like Dan on our main website – www.htj.tax I have mentioned Estonia before – https://www.mooresrowland.tax/?s=estonia One thing missing

Crypto Tax Calculations

Here’s what we wrote about crypto previously – https://www.mooresrowland.tax/?s=crypto In 2014, the IRS issued Notice 2014-21, 2014-16 I.R.B. 938 PDF, explaining that virtual currency is treated as